Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Simplicity Parenting


I am reading this book by Kim John Payne. The basic premise is that we need to slow down children's lives to spare them of the stress that overwhelming choices and competitive pressures bring upon them.

My favorite quote so far is:

Advertisers would have us believe that our kids have no inner life at all, except that which toys--particularly their own--can provide.
The author goes on to state that an overabundance of toys (and most kids have an overabundance) inhibits creative thinking.

I'm only on page 66. More to come.

Sunday, April 19, 2009

A Week O Food


Here is all the food we eat in a week (approximately). The cat does not count as food, he is a member of the family. However, in a pinch, we would consider all options.

Water - 3 gallons
Pineapple
Extra virgin olive oil
Cat food
Garbanzo beans (organic)
Buckwheat pancake mix
Orange marmalade
Peanuts (organic, unsalted)
Raisins (organic)
Bananas
Red onion
Apples (pink lady)
Apples (fuji)
Orange pepper
Mango
Falafel wrap
Tomatoes (Roma, 8)
Purple potatoes
Sesame bars (3)
Whole wheat tortillas
Avocado
Eggs
Butter
Emergen-C
Orange juice
Olives (garlic-stuffed, jar)
Milk (whole)
Black beans (can)
Almond Nut-Thins (crackers)
Kashi GoLean Crunch cereal
Cascadian Farms Honey Nut O's cereal
Baby spinach (organic)
Asiago cheese
Carrots (organic)
Beets (can)
Turkey meatballs
Homemade viniagrette salad dressing
Clementine tangerines
Feta cheese
Yogurt
Hummus

Not pictured:
Small cookies and cream gelato
Small dark chocolate ice cream
Homemade whole wheat bread
Homegrown basil
Homegrown cilantro

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Zack and Miri

Patty and I watched Zack and Miri (Make a Porno) a couple of weekends ago.  A comedy about a down on their luck pair of friends who make a porno and find love and material success.  It sounds ridiculous and though it offered many funny moments, I must say that I found it disturbing how the movie portrayed their enterprise as acceptable and praiseworthy.  It tried to have a feel-good ending with Zack and Miri being married and having a successful porno business.  Very strange.  Disturbing how porn has become so mainstream. 
 
I few years ago I would have called my current self a prude.  It's not that I have a problem with sex or bodies, I just think the cavalier attitude toward sex is way messed up.

Garage Ceiling

A 10 foot piece of ceiling fell out of the garage a few weeks ago.
 
This is the patch job.
 


Monday, April 13, 2009

Flutter

<embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f8/271557392" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoId=18328570001&playerId=271557392&viewerSecureGatewayURL=https://console.brightcove.com/services/amfgateway&servicesURL=http://services.brightcove.com/services&cdnURL=http://admin.brightcove.com&domain=embed&autoStart=false&" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="486" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed>

 

 

Thursday, April 9, 2009

My Face

Because you miss looking at me.

Thursday, April 2, 2009

Welfare for the Rich

There's been a lot of talk about tax payers funding our economy, which it's fairly well documented is quite effective at distributing wealth disproportionately to the richest of us.  I read the following quote on a newspaper website which puts another spin on the issue of taxpayer supported welfare for the rich:

 

Universities, especially those that maintain cauldrons of original research, are incredible engines of economic development. That is why so many pharmaceutical companies start up, for example, within an hour's drive of major research universities, like California's Berkeley and Stanford.

 

The person who wrote this was advocating more development of research universities to spur economic development. 

 

My interpretation of this is that our tax dollars fund universities, which leads to research that benefits the marketplace.  Sure these companies employ people and put out some truly useful goods and services, but are the taxpayers getting our full return on that investment?  When that company lays people off, do they have a safety net?  Are they being paid fairly even when they are employed?  Are those goods and services beneficial, or are they actually harmful?  Are historically under-supported people (aka, people targeted for destruction) being lifted up by this "economic development," or is their subjugation being reinforced?

 

Questions, questions.  I haz no answerz. 

 

 


Re(a)d (About) Meat

I found this article interesting.  Usually these health articles are kind of vague and scary, but this one tries to spell out the specific amount of red meat, etc. that was used in the study and explains exactly what the results were in more detail than usual.  Plus it involved 500,000 people, so it was a very expansive study group.  The group was 50-70 year olds, but I think it's relevant for anyone.
 
Looks like eating about 3.5 ounces of red meat per week will keep risk the lowest.  Possibly harder is less the conclusion I draw to eat less than 1 ounce of processed meat per week (anything cured, dried or smoked). 
 
Quote from the article: 'You don't have to be a vegan. You don't have to be a vegetarian.' But you really need to cut out the sausage and the pepperoni and the baloney, all those processed meats, or have them very little. You also need to be careful and cut down your red meat intake. Have it [only] a couple times a week." 
 


Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Nader-licious

 
One of many interesting posts on www.nader.org 
 
Also, I recommend "An Unreasonable Man," a documentary profile of Ralph Nader.

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Philosophy

I liked this:

 

The following is the philosophy of Charles Schultz, the creator of the Peanuts comic strip. You don’t have to actually answer the questions. Just read the through, you’ll get the point.

·         Name the five wealthiest people in the world.

·         Name the last five Heisman trophy winners.

·         Name the last five winners of the Miss America pageant.

·         Name ten people who have won the Nobel or Pulitzer Prize.

·         Name the last half dozen Academy Award winners for best actor and actress.

·         Name the last decade’s worth of World Series winners.

How did you do?
The point is, none of us remember the headliners of yesterday. These are not second -rate achievers. They are the best in their fields. But the applause dies. Awards tarnish. Achievements are forgotten. Accolades and certificates are buried with their owners.

Here’s another quiz. See how you do on this one:

·         List a few teachers who aided your journey through school.

·         Name three friends who have helped you through a difficult time.

·         Name five people who have taught you something worthwhile.

·         Think of a few people who have made you feel appreciated and special.

·         Think of five people you enjoy spending time with.

Easier?
The lesson: The people who make a difference in your life are not the ones with the most credentials, the most money, or the most awards. They are the ones that care.

 

Thursday, January 22, 2009

World Air Traffic

This is pretty cool.  Notice how the pattern changes as the daylight hits, then leaves, each area.


Friday, January 16, 2009

Will it Blend?

Probably I am the only person who has not seen this.  But if you have not, it’s unbelievably funny.  The deadpan comments from the “lab tech” dude are great.

 

http://www.willitblend.com/videos.aspx?type=unsafe&video=iphone

 

 

Tuesday, January 6, 2009

Beyond the Grave


Patty and I went to see a presentation on Sunday by a guy who claims to be able to speak to the dead. I think he said that we all have this ability but I forget what makes him special. Anyway, it was interesting to see him work. He bounced from person to person in the room randomly, claiming he was "getting something" from various parts of the room. I was nervous that he'd try to communicate with one of the spirits floating around me, which of course he did.

My theory on this man is that he starts out by setting up the rules in his favor. For example, he said that while he may say something to you that you doesn't make sense, it could make sense based on facts which you aren't currently aware of, or it could be a spirit talking who is trying to use you to communicate with someone that you once met but in truth you hardly know. That opens up immense possibilities for fudging.

Next, he enhances his odds at a successful "communication" by making a decisive statement of something he heard from a spirit, but allows audience members to self-identify as being the person who is connected with that statement. For example, he may state that he's getting a strong "miltary voice" trying to speak to someone about a recent auto accident. But that voice is near one of four people sitting in the corner and he's not sure who it's for - oh no! He encourages one of the people to identify themselves as the person being spoken to. Chances are better than zero that one of those four people had a male in their family with a military connection and who also had some connection to an auto accident within the past year.

And here's where his third and fourth tricks tie in - wide time frames and use of social networks. See, for Mr. spirit man, "recent" is relative. Got a spirit talking about that "recent" auto accident? YOU happen to work with someone who's sister had an accident 5 months ago? Okay, chances are good that one of the numerous people you know had an accident within the past year. The wide time frame and the numerous connections we all have make it much more likely that his predictions will appear real.

Another trick he uses is he draws on what he knows about people as a foundation for his communication. Got a shaved head? Mr. Communicator will claim he's hearing from someone in the military. Happen to be black? He'll throw out some slang and cop a working class southern black stereotypical tone to make your spirit sound more authentic. Sitting a bit too far from your apparent opposite sex partner (I noticed this with another couple), the spirits will comment on your relationship and how you need to work on it. Those spirits, so perceptive.

Now, he did hit a couple of things which seemed eerie. For one woman, he seemed to correctly know that she had two friends commit suicide in her life - a male and a female. And for another, he knew about a miscarriage. Lucky breaks I tell ya.

Do I think he's faking on purpose? No, I believe that people like the man I saw really believe that they can communicate with the dead. I believe they either hear voices or think they're somehow really communicating with spirits. When I was a kid, I thought I had x-ray vision because my left eye saw a slightly different image than my right (it's called parallax). And then there was that rumor that went around that when kids turn 13, they might find out that they're really sorcerers with special powers. I wish that were true, man, oh man. My theory - some people buy these stories and they never let go.

Or the SOB could be lying, too.

Either way, he got my $8, and I got to write this blog.

- Mike

Sunday, January 4, 2009

Memory Foam


Patty got me a memory foam pad for my side of our mattress. It feels very nice and cozy. She wasn't interested in having foam, so I'll be 1.5" higher than her from now on.

Friday, January 2, 2009

For the People Down South

The morning of a 6" snowfall Patty and I shoveled Dana and Marie's driveway. I couldn't resist it.


Thursday, January 1, 2009

New York

Went to Albany, NY, for the holiday break. Some highlights below - other photos can be found at
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pattyandmike/tags/200812albany/show/ The photos from this trip have been tagged "2008-12_Albany".

Extra special video clips are forthcoming!!!